Advertisement
Truth and Consequences: Teaching Global Warming Doesn't Have to Spell 'Doom'
Turn fear to hope and action when discussing climate change with the next generation.
by Kevin Sweeney
Credit: Indigo Flores
Last April, while chaperoning my daughter's field trip, I mentioned to a fellow parent that I was going to visit Ms. Jackson's class to talk about climate change. Another parent, not involved in our conversation, gasped and lunged toward us. "You're not going to talk to the class about climate change," she said. "They'll be petrified!"
On the day I spoke to the class, I arrived early, during recess. Two students were inside, sitting at computer terminals, and when Ms. Jackson reminded them of my topic, they both gave exaggerated negative looks that begged an explanation. They responded with the same message: Climate change is scary, and we don't want to be scared.
Both incidents were reminders that a conversation about climate change is often, really, a conversation about fear. And, to be clear, there is reason for fear. James Hansen, America's leading climate scientist, says if we continue with business as usual, half the species that exist today will be extinct at the century's end. It would be a heartbreaking saga, played out in slow motion during the lifetime of today's fifth graders.
Click here for green educational resources
Related Green Articles:
Amazing Grace:
A visit to the breeding grounds of the majestic gray whale. Read MoreKids Count:
Citizen-scientist students learn environmental activism. Read More
Species loss is only part of the story. I spent most of last year working with eleven retired three- and four-star admirals and generals on a report assessing the national-security implications of climate change. (That work, incidentally, is what led to my invitation to talk with the students.) Their report suggested that water and food shortages, combined with violent weather events, could lead to massive upheavals and instigate conflicts in every global region. These were grown men, all of them battle tested, and they found the news about climate change to be very scary indeed.
What, then, does one say to fifth graders?
Lacking confidence that I might know this on my own, I asked a dozen friends for advice. Their responses brought focus to the one-hour classroom discussion.
One friend said to be honest but selective: Admit that the challenge is great, give them one or two examples of consequences, and focus on good things that are happening. This was helpful. The honesty built trust with the students, and talk of political momentum lightened the discussion.
Another friend suggested I give them something easy to do, something a bit more difficult, and something very challenging for "homework." This helped engage kids at different levels. For an easy task, I asked them to replace one incandescent lightbulb with a fluorescent one. For a midrange task, I suggested putting up a clothesline in the backyard and hanging out clothes to dry.
For the stretch, I suggested they talk to their parents about dissecting their family's energy bills, comparing next month's bill with the same month last year. If their energy usage and costs went down, perhaps they could split the difference with their parents. This way, it becomes a business for the student, who now has a financial incentive to turn off the lights, unplug the appliances, and find new ways to save energy.
The follow-up essays, assigned by the teacher, Ms. Jackson, showed that the clothesline idea clearly resonated with the students. In class, we had talked about how clothes, sheets, and towels feel different when line dried. The students liked the notion that giving up something (the convenience of a dryer) could also mean they get something (energy savings).
The best advice from friends was to focus less on the details and more on a framework. As the science of climate change gets better, the news gets worse. This generation of children needs a way to process these news accounts; without it, there is every reason to believe they might shut down emotionally or lose themselves in avoidance tactics.
Here, I made a quick point about bad news: It generally assumes we will continue with business as usual, doing nothing about the causes of climate change. That, of course, may not always be so, and these kids themselves can help bring about change. (See "A Climate of Hope.")
The bigger point was to consider what one might say of their generation seventy years from now. I talked of their destiny, at least as I see it, saying that their generation will be the one to develop solutions and help us understand how to live in a changing world. They would do so, in part, because they must. We talked of what it might feel like to be part of such a cause, or to know that their generation and their country would be leading an effort to help protect the planet.
This idea, too, was a focus of the student essays. They liked that they might be part of a movement, and that they might be called to do something great or heroic, that responding to this challenge might give their lives greater meaning. Their words were a reminder of a vital lesson -- one I need to review often: Climate change discussions may start with a sense of fear, but we can, and must, move them toward a sense of hope.
Teaching Global Warming Doesn't Have to Spell 'Doom'
Submitted by michael angel (not verified) on August 24, 2008 - 19:45.
Excellent article
Some other resources
Kids
http://cires.colorado.edu/education/k12/makingclimatehot/index.html
more grown up
http://hypography.com/forums/terra-preta.html
FOR SCEPTICS -knock yourself out arguing here:-
http://hypography.com/forums/environmental-studies/13705-my-belief-global-warming-getting-shaky.html
We need the grown ups not to despair and throw it in the "too Hard" basket too!
There is no longer room for doubt about global warming
Submitted by Michelle (not verified) on July 30, 2008 - 12:01.
(this is in response to the comments left by skeptics)
i still find it extremely difficult to believe that there are people in this country who still choose to believe that global warming is a hoax and that it is poor science. The proof of climate change is as clear as crystal, just look at changing weather patterns, look at melting ice, look at the number of species that are now in danger of becoming extinct. There is evidence that shows that our burning of fossil fuels does add carbon dioxide (a lot of it, mind you) to the atmosphere, and carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. It really doesn't take a scientist to put these pieces together.
What the scientific community has come to realize is that the human species is profoundly affecting the earth's climate at a rate that the earth has never been able to produce.
In less than 200 years, we have released almost all of the carbon that took the earth millions of years to scrub out of the atmosphere.
Don't you think that changes anything?
It's really straight up ignorance to think that the human race, with all of the deforestation and pollution, is not big enough to initiate something has detrimental as premature climate change?
The fact of the matter is that the earth is not in any trouble at all, but many of the species on earth (including us) are at risk of extinction.
It doesn't take a lot to do something loving for the earth. You can't deny that all of our millions of tons of garbage pollute the earth, so think about it this way:
You keep your house clean, right? It's your living space, your little domicile, you wouldn't want garbage underneath your floorboards or insulating your walls or floating in your sink and bathtub, right? The same principle applies to the earth.
Everything you have, you have because of the earth. Every single thing. The earth is your home, it is all of our homes, so it is our responsibility to clean up after the messes we make instead of leaving them for future generations or ignoring them completely.
That's really all I have to say.
Teaching Global Warming Doesn't Have to Spell 'Doom'
Submitted by Trish (not verified) on June 29, 2008 - 17:25.
This was a very sensitive topic for my children. I wasnt really sure how to approach the issue with them, especially since i dont believe that the planet is doomed like mass media makes it seem. My friend told me about this book called Deb and Seby, www.debandseby.com . It was cute and funny, and told my kids to "chillax" about whats going on with our planet.
teaching of our kids
Submitted by mike (not verified) on June 8, 2008 - 13:25.
Many of you make mention of it in your rebuttle's but I don't think any of you heard yourselves saying it. "Teaching our kids" our own kids!. I do not appreciate the underlying tone of the article being a lesson directed at the reader, not just a recalled story to share. If the author has something to say then publish an article and don't thinly veil the motive of knowing what's best for me and my family. Now back to the kid's, I wan't my children to be learning criteria of educational value and let me personally decide what to teach my children of moral values. This is where I declare a breakdown in education. No wonder we are not on the top of the list in education worldwide.
Global warming is a hoax
Submitted by Carina (not verified) on February 27, 2008 - 16:26.
Oh great, we're going to brainwash all of the next generation by talking about how scary Global Warming is, how horrible, how we're all going to die. Why couldn't classes have discussions and debates about whether it was really happening? That would make them think and decide for themself. I don't believe Global Warming is happening becaus of us, and I think we have a lot of other problems to be worried about and inform students about other than this whole overblown hoax. I hope some people have sense and say, "Well, I'll teach it, but I'll show the other side." Then the kids would think for themsleves and come to their senses.
Teaching Climate Change in a Positive Way
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on October 10, 2007 - 17:22.
Teaching climate change in a positive way is possible and necessary. Recent National Science Foundation studies show that students at 6th grade and below are deciding whether they will pursue science, technology, engineering and math education and careers. You may have heard the the comments from these student, or your own child, such as "I'm no good at ___". Or, "Why bother with ___." That's the sound of another scientist, engineer, or mathematician disappearing.
Climate Change and other real environmental issues provide an immediate opportunity to better understand how the real world works and how individuals can (collectively and alone) make a real difference. This is the type of problem-based learning that creates capable students that higher education institutions and employers are thirsty for.
Students can and do learn how things operate as a system with many complex parts, relationships, and simultaneously situations. Simple cause, effect, creating feelings of helplessness or fear are signs of old thinking from the industrial age, outdated teaching approaches, and incomplete reasoning. Just ask the students about complex high-speed video games or computer-based internet communication systems. The students are VERY familiar with high-speed, dynamic systems where understanding variable relationships and way points are critical to success. It's just in another context.
Students and families should approach these matters in an age-appropriate way. They should attempt to look for larger patterns that can be applied to numerous situations. Such as understanding that some things accumulate over time. Also, that they can speed up over time. And change quickly. Such as the "snow ball effect". Where a snow ball in, ideal circumstances, rolls down a hill, accumulates more snow and mass, thereby becoming larger and moving faster.
If someone installs an and energy efficient light bulb in their home or school that creates a small positive outcome. Having students to both install their own energy efficient light bulb AND encouraging others to do so as well creates the potential for exponential positive change in a very short time. This is another example of the "snow ball effect".
Students can act in teams of two or more to increase the social component of learning. They can share responsibilities for installing lights, encouraging others, tracking, and reporting results. Proper knowledge, and positive models enable the youngest of students to play a key role as a "policy mover", communicator, and accountant. Students communicate with decision-makers, such as parents that purchase bulbs and can safely install them. These roles and methods can be applied in numerous situations and students can advance through the roles as they learn more and mature.
MIT has a program that teaches elementary age students how to learn and understand dynamic systems. The lessons are freely available and very effective. They frequently use environmental situations as examples.
The combination of factual content, age-appropriateness, teaching methods taking into account various learning styles, and dynamic systems can make environmental studies a robust and positive learning experience for all ages.
Global Warming
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on October 10, 2007 - 12:21.
I wish people would quit arguing about whether man is responsible for global warming or if it's even a reality. Regardless of the truth of either of those things, there are plenty of undisputed reasons for our country to have a crash program to promote conservation of resources and develop alternative enery--such as health problems, the dwindling of finite resources, the ever-increasing world population, increasing energy prices, and burgeoning demand for energy. This fall my elementary school organized an environmental team (with staff and students). We're starting with a recycling program and education about ways to cut down on waste, but we have harder goals in mind--such as persuading our district to quit using throw-away styrofoam trays (which will never decompose) in the cafeteria. I shudder to think of the number of them that go in our landfill each day, and our garbage bills have recently gone up substantially because we had to open a new landfill. Most people have no idea how many ways and to what extent each of us is negatively impacted by our wastefulness, consumption, and pollution.
Mislead by poor science
Submitted by ktown realist (not verified) on October 9, 2007 - 18:24.
The self centered focus of the majority of the inhabitants of planet earth is amazing. Perhaps we are polluting and being poor stewards of this wonderful planet on which we exist, which indeed calls for conservation action.
Yet, have we studied the relative temperatures on our fellow planets? If we can be so sure of our 'scientific' research of earth's temperature thousands of years ago, surely we can determine the relative increase or decrease of our fellow planets. Just maybe, it is true that our sun is responsible for this trend of increase.
I liken this to murder investigators who are so sure they know who the culprit is that they fail to consider other possibilities - including the true murderer.
After all, we still don't know what happened to the dinosaurs. And we weren't polluting the atmosphere then.
This is so important...
Submitted by Mary (not verified) on October 5, 2007 - 17:33.
This is such an important topic to discuss with our kids, as well as with each other as adults. As mentioned in this article, these conversations must be done in a way that makes kids (and adults) feel empowered to do something. It's also just as important for the adults in this world to lead by example. As a 50 year old woman I am amazed every time I go to an alternative energy/climate change event and look at how many in attendance are young people in their 20's. Thank goodness for these young folks! Where are all the people in their 40's, 50's, 60's?
I taught middle school science and we investigated climate change. The kids were more than willing to learn the content and what they could do. They were proud to bring information home to their families and most families were proud to alter their energy consumption even if they did so in a small way. It feels good to do something that you feel is morally right.
As far as the Sun idea mentioned above..."What if you're wrong?" If we are saying that humans don't have an impact on our climate and we don't respond in any proactive way...what if we're wrong? The consequences of this error are too grave to gamble with. It's long past time to stop that dangerous thinking and start making the changes necessary so our kids and grandkids don't have to deal with our ignorance and avoidance.
My generation needs to solve this now
Submitted by inel (not verified) on October 5, 2007 - 09:35.
You are a generation too late! Your penultimate paragraph says:
"The bigger point was to consider what one might say of their generation seventy years from now. I talked of their destiny, at least as I see it, saying that their generation will be the one to develop solutions and help us understand how to live in a changing world. They would do so, in part, because they must. We talked of what it might feel like to be part of such a cause, or to know that their generation and their country would be leading an effort to help protect the planet."
I agree with the advice to provide a framework to kids as well as suggesting a few specific actions to get them started. However, there is one point that needs to be repeated again and again:
this generation—my generation—our adult generation—is working as hard as we can to combat climate change.
If we are not, we need to tell kids why not. If we are too selfish, too lazy, or too busy to be bothered to be heroes ourselves, we should tell kids that too. We owe them our honesty.
If kids ask "How is your generation tackling climate change?" we need to tell them what we are doing at work and at home, and what all the adults we know are doing about it, and how many expert scientists are providing the information we need to understand the problem, and how many expert engineers are designing and producing solutions to combat climate change.
If kids ask "What are you doing about climate change yourself?" each adult should then be able to rattle off a list of ways in which he has reduced his own carbon footprint and that of his family. It is not good enough to tell children "Lucky you! Your generation will have all the excitement of dealing with our climate challenge." if we are not prepared to let them see how excited we are ourselves at the opportunities this new era affords.
If we cannot answer those questions honestly and explain how we have made a difference already by reducing our carbon footprints at home and at work, and how we intend to do more of the same, my generation of adults deserves the contempt of kids today.
Post new comment